Word of the week: pigs
(aka yet another series I don't plan to do every week)
At the request of the Dim, Miss R. who is either acting dumb or is well just a Dim, so here is the defintion from http://www.urbandictionary.com
"1. Pink thing that rolls around in mud and eventually becomes a ham sandwich.
2. Correct name for the so-called 'public servants' colloquially known as the police, for example the neo-nazi organization the metropolitan police who spend most of their time arresting people for DWB, taking bribes from drug dealers (a 2001 report said corruption in the UK police was at 'third world levels'), abusing vulnerable women (another more recent report said the uk police were letting down women who needed them most and noted a huge increase in sexual assualt BY the police on women who had turned to them for help), stop and search black people in inner city london, and causing death in custody but getting away with it because some idiots actually trust these fools and take them at their word.
'sarge, I hate women and want to rape one, I like beating up innocent people and I am a member of the national front.'
'well done son, you'll go far. the pigs need your sort. it's either that or join the army'"
posted by Citisucks @ 11:57 AM
7 Comments:
Next thing we know, you will be stating known facts are not "facts" (according to red state).
And you have yet to answer a single question I have asked or cite anything!
That is why you are a SUV liberal hypocrite!
So do you at least acknowledge that some cops are pigs?
It was never under dispute that some cops are pigs. That is not the issue.
The issue is that you said all cops are pigs.
Well, good I am glad that you at least acknowledge that some pigs are pigs.
Now please comment on how deleting comments is consistent with a love of free speech?????
I am not the government. I do not have to provide a forum for you to speak. I never said your speech should be banned by the GOVERNMENT, but I fail to see why I have to provide a forum for your ignorance. If you want to preach your ignorance, then feel free to on your blog. Please do not infect my blog with non-thought.
It is that simple. There are good cops and there are bad cops, just as there are good people and bad people.
Engaging in such generalized speech (all cops are pigs, "corporare terrorists" at every single post, "SUV liberal hypocrit" (mispelling hypocrite), without an ounce of data to back it up is not conducive to anything.
If you want to engage in thoughtful debate, I would be more than happy to host your comments. If you want to say "Here is data on how cops have abused people," then I would be happy to engage you and even agree with you that cops have abused some people in the past.
But to say such blanket generalizations is anti-thought, and I refuse to cater to anti-thought.
I cannot make myself any clearer.
Present rational arguments, and I will not delete them. Albion Moonlight posted on my blog - I disagreed with Albion Moonlight, and I did not delete the comments. Why? They were at least attempting to engage in rational discussion.
Come up with new material, use your brain, and I will be happy to engage you.
Until then, I will continue deleting your posts.
I like cops. Especially when they beat the crap out of dirty hippies.
;)
By the way, I give my thanks to Ralph for giving Bush Florida in 2000.
Miss R,
You are correct that you do not have to give me a forum to speak-that is not the point. The point is that you frequently emphasize how you are strongly pro-free speech and then you turn around and engage in anti-speech behavior. The point is that you are a hypocrite-you hold the rest of the world to a standard you refuse to uphold yourself.
The reason you seek to deny be free speech is because you know I am correct and can't handle it.
Jason, your just sad and pathetic. But the day your job is outsourced due to the corporate terrorists in the government you will see just how wrong you are!
Oh and by the way Ralph Nadar did not give anyone Florida, Florida was stolen. The Green Party did not stop the Democrats from “winning” the elections. It was racist voting technology that stole the right to vote from numerous minority people that cost the election. In fact, evidence shows the number of people who were denied voting rights in Florida, is larger than the number of people who voted Green. In fact, it was the Green Party that insisted that the votes be recounted and that be fix the voting technologies, while the Democrats and Republicans both agreed to let the technology that denies minorities votes stay. Besides this it is the Demcrats and Republicans, who are similar and the Green Party is the opposition party to the two other parties.
Post a Comment
<< Home